abortion:
PROPOSING A TEMPORARY COMPROMISE
How would the ideal society handle this difficult
issue? The complications are due to the fact that both sides have valid
concerns. The war is about ethical priorities. I would like to propose
the specifics of a temporary truce.
Compromise is an option that has not been
discussed. It’s considered preposterous. The two sides of the abortion
war are absolute in their goals and therefore keep struggling toward
total victory. A person suggesting to them the acceptance of less than
their every wish would probably be ridiculed by both. Yet a truce is
what I want to urge. People say they cannot compromise a woman’s right
to choose or compromise an emerging life. I say that they should
compromise because a torn, continually warring society is not
acceptable either.
I want a compromise, for a reasonable period (such
as 18 years, the numerical value of the Hebrew word for “life”), during
which each camp will get some but not all of what it wants. We could
all rest for a while from the strife. The two sides could
experience the agreed-upon terms and maybe regroup, refining their
objectives if still unsatisfied. It would be a more tranquil time and
one in which we could feel some progress toward reaching a better
society. Let’s start visualizing peace in the abortion area.
What would be the components of this compromise? I will give my
opinion but please feel free to offer your own constructive
suggestions. The important thing is that you think “negotiation” rather
than “crushing the opposition”.
My position on the abortion issue is inspired by the Bible, and in particular, by the following teachings that I see there:
* Creating new
life carelessly and extinguishing it needlessly are contrary to the
harmony of nature. Termination of a pregnancy is to be avoided, unless
there are other, even more important values that
intervene.
- One of these higher values is the mother’s life
and long-term health. Any danger to either is to be discussed with
medical personnel and the decision will be made by the mother.
- A second higher value is to avoid a
lifetime of suffering on the part of the new human being (as with
serious defects or diseases). Again, the decision is to be made by the
mother.
- A third is to prevent the fruition of rape and incest. Once again the decision is to be made by the mother.
The two sides would agree that these three special
circumstances are the only reasonable basis for an abortion. Lacking
these conditions, pregnancies would be encouraged until birth. What do I
mean by “encouraged”?
- Society would adopt and teach the value that
since a life has been started, the proper (ethical) course of action on
the part of the mother is to have the baby. Both sides would convey
this attitude.
- We would not take the nonsensical position that
we want to preserve life but are not willing to support it during
pregnancy. Therefore, society, at public expense, during the pregnancy,
would provide economically for the mother and future child’s material
needs if other support was not forthcoming.
- Society, at public expense, would provide,
during pregnancy, the appropriate health services to mother and future
child if other help were not available.
Once a child is born, society would hold the
position that the mother should either provide for the child from
thereon or put the child up for adoption. Minor temporary assistance
could also be offered to the mother or to the new parents.
How would this system be enforced? There would be
some not overly harsh penalties for the mother if she insisted on an
abortion that was not excused by the three special circumstances.
Perhaps some community service on her part would be an appropriate
atonement for the sad events. Society would be very clear in its
disapproval of the terminated pregnancy.
I realize that an unwanted pregnancy can be
extremely distressing to the woman involved even when the exceptional
conditions mentioned above are not present. Also, we don’t want to
drive her to an unsafe abortion. Society has to handle this situation
with compassion by keeping safe abortions available while at the same
time making it very definitely known that completion of the pregnancy
is its strong preference. Parents, teachers, counselors, and doctors
would all convey this message. We must move away from treating
potential life or any life too lightly.
I would like society to discuss and then implement
the compromise I have outlined. There should be a sincere effort on
the part of everyone to make it work. If this approach to life
were adopted, then it would need to be taught as our current ethical
stance. The education of the public, and especially of the young,
is absolutely crucial. These compromise terms would take their place
among the country’s standards of conduct.
After eighteen years of this compromise, people
could decide whether we have reached a better society than the one
we’ve had for some time now. I am hoping we’ll all feel better
about our handling of life and human concerns. Do you agree that this
compromise would be a step forward?
|